Bush started slide into socialism

People tend to have a very short memory, and it may be time to toss out a friendly reminder: the mainstream Republicans are no friends of the Constitution, they are no friends of liberty, and they are completely controlled by the same forces that control Obama.

Under the last administration, the NWO was able to implement many of their long term, socialist plans. These would include the expanded powers of the executive branch, the Patriot Act, and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, all a means for centralizing powers in the hands of the federal government. That was bad enough, but the economic turn toward socialism that took place while Bush was president was staggering.

Bush inherited a country that was enjoying its largest budget surplus ever. That, to me, sounds like the goal of capitalism: build wealth. Bush almost immediately spend all of that, and started getting involved in massive deficit spending. Why? Because of the largely unilateral (“coalition of the willing” not withstanding) decision to sweep aside all objections and illegally enter a war without pretext, another instance of the state acting without the consort of the people.

When we talk about debt, there has to be someone holding those treasury notes that the Bush deficit spending created, and guess who was the largest holder of American debt during the Bush years? That would be The People’s Republic of China, a SOCIALIST country. During the last year of the Clinton presidency, the U.S. had a 6.039 billion dollar trade deficit with China; not so good. But here are the annual trade deficits that we had with the socialists in China during the Bush years (in billions):

2001: $7.24
2002: $6.846
2003: $9.334
2004: $11.469
2005: $15.277
2006: $17.986
2007: $21.251
2008: $20.636

How would you describe the practice of a person in charge of a country’s spending pouring capital into a socialist country? And this is something that cost American’s their jobs, driving them to social programs like unemployment compensation, Medicaid, and welfare. How can anyone claim that Bush didn’t further the cause of socialism?

Plus, the bank and insurance bailouts happened on the Republican watch, remember? It was George W. Bush that bought 80% of the insurance giant AIG and got the government into the insurance business!! How is it that now that this Obama health tax has passed, the mainstream Republicans are purporting to be some sort of true blue freedom fighters staving off the “red threat?”

Let’s stay vigilant and not get swept into the trap of emotion and oversimplification that the central bankers have set here. The Democrats and the Republicans serve the central bankers, and the banking cartel will always win because they own both sides of the “political debate.” (I use quotes because what really needs to be debated, like the end of the Fed, never enters the picture.)

Don’t fall for this charade. This is not a statement in support of Obama by any stretch of the imagination; he is just as bad as Bush, but not a million times worse as many on the right are duped into believing. They say don’t hate the player, hate the game, and the way that people are hating Obama, as though he is actually in charge of something, is asinine. If this uninformed and sheep-like behavior continues from the right, and we all join hands and vote for mainstream Republicans, all we are doing is empowering the same global bankers who are controlling the “super villain” Obama.